22 aprile 2012

FESTIVAL DI CANNES 2012



(Testo aggiornato il 27 maggio 2012)

La 65esima edizione del Festival di Cannes si svolgerà dal 16 al 27 maggio 2012. Nanni Moretti è presidente di giuria della selezione ufficiale. Segnalo di seguito i titoli indiani in cartellone:
* Miss Lovely, in concorso nella sezione Un certain regard, di Ashim Ahluwalia, con Nawazuddin Siddiqui. Miss Lovely esplora l'ambiente delle produzioni di B-movie. I protagonisti sono due fratelli che realizzano horror negli anni ottanta del secolo scorso. In un'intervista rilasciata nel 2010 a DearCinema, Ahluwalia racconta l'originale genesi della pellicola: 'Circa dieci anni fa, trascorsi molto tempo gironzolando sui set di film davvero di bassa fattura. Stavo progettando un documentario sulla produzione di un porno-horror, Maut Ka Chehra, realizzato da un manipolo di ex galeotti. Feci un mucchio di bevute con i cast e con le troupe di quelle pellicole, tutte persone fantastiche. Quei cineasti rinnegati creavano film dal nulla. Ero dinanzi ad una produzione cinematografica di disadattati genuinamente indipendenti, che lavoravano ai margini, con budget pateticamente miseri, e che facevano cinema con sangue, lacrime e sudore. La loro grezza energia mi ricordava la ragione per cui io stesso volevo in primo luogo fare cinema. Erano però tutti troppo spaventati dal confidarsi dinanzi alla mia telecamera, perché vi era anche un giro di malavita e prostituzione. Così il progetto del documentario fallì. Il materiale che raccolsi in quell'occasione e le persone che incontrai sono la base di Miss Lovely';
* Kalpana (1948) di Uday Shankar, sezione Cannes classics, in versione restaurata da L'immagine ritrovata di Bologna;  
* Gangs of Wasseypur I & II di Anurag Kashyap, nell'ambito della Quinzaine des réalisateurs. Prima mondiale. Kashyap ha commentato nel suo profilo Twitter: 'Sono all'aeroporto di Bruxelles, in un'area silenziosa, ma vorrei gridare a squarciagola. Sono felicissimo. Ho deciso di festeggiare regalandomi un cappello da cowboy. Ora sembro un buffone, e continuo a sorridere a tutti';
* Peddlers di Vasan Bala, in concorso per la Caméra d'or nell'ambito della Semaine de la critique. Prima mondiale.


Nell'ambito della Quinzaine des réalisateurs, segnalo il seminario Multiplicities of Indian cinema - Bollywood: the tree obscuring the forest? in programma il 23 maggio 2012, a cui interverranno, fra gli altri, Anurag Kashyap e Sudhir Mishra. Al Marché du film sarà presente la casa di produzione Yash Raj Films per proporre ai distributori internazionali il suo pacchetto di pellicole. I media indiani hanno annunciato la partecipazione alla manifestazione di Aishwarya Rai (per l'undicesimo anno consecutivo), Sonam Kapoor, Manoj Bajpayee, Onir e Arjun Rampal. 


RASSEGNA STAMPA

- Could he be the next Irrfan Khan?, Aseem Chhabra, Rediff, 30 aprile 2012: intervista concessa da Nawazuddin Siddiqui
- Intervista concessa da Vasan Bala a Hindustan Times pubblicata il 2 maggio 2012
- Intervista concessa da Anurag Kashyap a Box Office India pubblicata il 4 maggio 2012: Com'è nata l'idea di Gangs of Wasseypur? 'I went to watch Kalki’s (Koechlin) play at Prithvi (teatro di Mumbai) and was sitting at the café. A guy spotted me sitting alone and started narrating his story. His name was Zeishan Quadri. I knew immediately that I would make this film. In Wasseypur, people actually live their lives as if they were in a Hindi film'. Alcune considerazioni sono davvero esilaranti: 'I am also introducing Tigmanshu Dhulia in the film and have given him a lot of screen space, unlike what he did to me in his film Shagird'. E ancora: 'My film has 25 item songs in it. Every character is an item. In fact, the entire film is an item'.
- It's a great year for Indian cinema, Patcy N., Rediff, 7 maggio 2012 (seconda parte: clicca qui) - Intervista concessa da Anurag Kashyap:
'Do you think Indian cinema is changing?
It is a great year for Indian cinema. (...) It is not necessary to have stars in a film; the subject matter is the star of the film. It is a huge thing that all kinds of cinema is being made in India today. (...) The greater thing is that my kind of film is also doing well these days, which is huge.
You think audiences today are open-minded?
No, some audiences are not open-minded even today, but now there are all kinds of audiences.
Tell us about Wasseypur.
It's a very long film. It is very desi and rooted. It is based on many true stories but we have fictionalised it because the characters that we have used in the film still exist in Wasseypur. We have changed the names and timeline of a few events. Wasseypur has a very different kind of atmosphere. People watch cinema the whole day. Their lives are influenced by cinema. Everybody carries a gun. It is a very strange world. It is not like any underworld that you have known and seen. I came to Mumbai (...) but my brother, by making Dabangg, reminded me of my roots. Manoj Bajpayee's house in the film is my house, where I lived and where Abhinav (Anurag's brother and director of Dabangg) was born. It was in Tashkent Colony, Obra, Uttar Pradesh. Now it is a ghost town so it was fun revisiting. (...)
The film is too long...
The story was so long that it was difficult deciding how to make it into one film. I had decided that I will narrate the whole story, whether it takes seven or 10 hours. We have edited it to 5 hours 20 minutes and it will be shown in two parts. It has 340 cast actors who have dialogues. When we wrote the script we wrote it in such a way that they look like two different stand-alone stories, but watched together, they look like one. The story covers three generations, from 1941 to 2009. We will release part one first and decide on the release of part two later this year. Both parts are ready and we will show both parts in Cannes.  
Why did you choose Manoj Bajpayee?
Manoj Bajpayee belongs to Bihar, and I am making a film based in that part of the country. Whenever we have worked together (Satya, Shool) we have created fireworks. Manoj knows my best and I know his best. Director Tigmanshu Dhulia is the main villain in the film. He is a very good actor having learnt acting at the National School of Drama. We will introduce him as an actor in this film. He is outstanding; he plays a character who ages from 40 to 90. You have to watch his performance to believe me. (...)
You have said that all the songs in the film are item numbers. Why?
The music used in the film is rooted. We have used traditional Indian songs that we don't listen too much nowadays. We searched for North Indian songs with sexual overtones that were sung at weddings and recomposed them in a modern context. (...) There are 25 songs in the film and they are all item songs. (...)
Ram Gopal Varma also shot two films together (Rakht Charitra) and released them one after the other. Everybody saw part one, nobody saw part two because it was too gory. Will that happen to Gangs of Wasseypur?
This is not a gory film. It's a fun film. There is no deliberate comedy - it is just the way people are, the way they talk and the way they react. They live in a well and have never seen the world. The atmosphere is so new and quirky, but it's also an India that exists. (...) There are characters in the film who dress like their favourite actors, walk and talk like them, and mouth their film dialogues. I would say Bollywood's actual fan base is in Wasseypur. All the people in Wasseypur are foot soldiers, criminals, illegal businessmen. I have never seen this mix of Bollywood and crime anywhere else. The star of the film is the place, it's that world'.


- I am still a struggler, Shashi Priya, The Times of India, 12 maggio 2012 - Intervista concessa da Anurag Kashyap: 'I am working in an industry where people are very conditioned. They see things just one way and it took me a long time to make them see things in another manner. My films got banned and I got wondering what’s wrong. Then I realised the problem was with the system. It does not define my films as cinema. My struggle was that I saw films differently from others in the space I worked in. (...) Entertainment’s definition has been reduced to making people happy. Entertainment can be many things. Industry has taken a long time to understand what I am doing is also entertainment. The struggle is still there, even though it’s not as much as it was a decade back'.
- Intervista concessa da Nanni Moretti a Libération pubblicata il 15 maggio 2012. Moretti illustra le regole che ha imposto ai membri della giuria: ''Un: ne pas applaudir avant ni après les projections, parce que vous allez être observé et que le moindre geste sera interprété. Deux: voir tous les films bien entendu, et du début à la fin. Trois: faire souvent des réunions. Quatre: ne pas aller aux fêtes des films en compétition [Moretti rigole]. Je me souviens des jurés qui m'imploraient pour aller à la fête d'un film indien très musical et dansant. Cette année, ce quatrième commandement, je ne le dirai pas!'.
- Moment of glory, Sangeetha Devi Dundoo, The Hindu, 16 maggio 2012:
'Ninety-four-year-old Amala Shankar, wife of late dancer/director Uday Shankar will be walking the red carpet at the Cannes Film Festival today for the screening of the new and restored version of Uday Shankar's Kalpana (1948). (...) Like most other classics, the negatives of Kalpana, too, were left neglected. Ad filmmaker Shivendra Singh (...) mediated between Martin Scorsese's World Cinema Foundation (WCF) and Uday Shankar's family. (...) “WCF, founded by Martin Scorsese, specialises in restoration of old films and works closely with a restoration lab in Bologna, Italy. WCF works on restoration from the money pooled in by film enthusiasts. I learnt that the WCF was looking to restore Kalpana but their efforts to get the negatives turned futile. I had seen the film at a private screening and felt it would do a world of good to have it restored. In India, old films, like old monuments, are given a heritage tag but left to rot,” he says. (...) “I had to convince authorities at National Film Archive of India (NFAI) on why I had to send it to the restoration lab in Bologna. How many of our officials care about Martin Scorsese wanting to restore an Indian film? The tough part was to make them understand that there is no monetary benefit out of this restoration work,” says Shivendra. After persistent efforts, Shivendra was able to procure the rights and send the negatives to Bologna. “Once the restoration work was carried out, Martin Scorsese had recommended Kalpana for screening at Cannes. It will be a huge recognition when Amala Shankar walks the red carpet,” says Shivendra. (...) As director of Dungarpur films, Shivendra specialises in ad filmmaking. Besides that, he has also made a documentary titled Celluloid Man (prima mondiale a Bologna il prossimo giugno), on P.K. Nair, the founder of NFAI. (...) The restoration lab in Bologna also intends to work on Ritwik Ghatak's Meghe Dhaka Tara (aggiornamento del 27 dicembre 2021: nel 2019 Meghe Dhaka Tara è stato restaurato, e proiettato a Bologna nel 2020)'.

Il cast di Gangs of Wasseypur - Cannes, 2012


- The leader of the pack, Anuj Kumar, The Hindu, 17 maggio 2012 - Intervista concessa da Anurag Kashyap:
'This is proving to be the year when Hindi cinema ventured beyond the beaten track of big cities, glitzy metros and foreign shores to tell stories that matter to you and me. (...) “The big need in Indian cinema is to look within. Dibakar Banerjee and Vishal Bhardwaj stuck to the roots. I was the one who strayed. It is Tamil cinema which inspired me to return to my roots,” says Anurag. (...) He clarifies it is not the mainstream masala fair from the South, which is inspiring Bollywood these days, that hooked him. “I got hooked to films like ‘Subramaniapuram', ‘Aadukulam' (...). Watching these films, I realised I come from North India where many such stories exist in small towns and villages and I am stuck in cities.”
Narrating his journey to the coal mines, Anurag says, “Writer Zeishan Quadri comes from Wasseypur, which was once in Bengal, then in Bihar and is now part of Dhanbad in Jharkhand. It sounded unbelievable and I like verifying stories so I started researching because the way Zeishan told the story, it sounded very similar to Mumbai's gangster films. Having been part of ‘Satya' and having made ‘Black Friday', I didn't want to tell the same story with a slight change in the atmosphere. I wanted to explore what mafia do besides killing each other or playing power games. What fascinated me was this is one story where I could trace the origin of the mafia in India. So I decided to go back to 1941 to explore how and in what circumstances the mafia came out. Coal was the first natural resource to be exploited in the country and the coal mafia was the first mafia. The resource belonged to everyone but after the British left, the coal mines were allotted only to the Tatas, Birlas and Thapars. They were not given to people who lived there and whose survival depended on them. The big corporates needed coal for their industries but they didn't know how to run the coal mines so they hired the same people who used to run mines during the British period. There used to be a pehalwan who used to make people work. After Independence suddenly people realised that it is a natural resource and belongs to everybody and there is a lot of money to be made. This led to rampant pilferage. Situations kept changing. The Constitution came, Babu Jagjivan Ram became the Labour Minister. He supported formation of unions but then the mafia started operating through unions. When the mines were nationalised, the mafia found its way through that as well. Like the Naxal story, at the end of the day, it is the story of survival.”
As for the conscience, he says those who indulged in pilferage explained to themselves that when everybody is taking it why not they. (...) “Everybody wanted his share. The film captures the changing nature of the business, the vengeance and the politics of it all through three generations of one family.” Talking about the layers in the tale, Anurag says the film is holding a mirror to one area, which is similar to a lot of others areas. “What is happening in Wasseypur is also happening in places like Chandauli, places where mining is happening.” The research led to interesting findings like Bollywood's influence on the mafia, and Anurag tries to put it in context. “With Amitabh Bachchan Bollywood entered their lives. When they saw ‘Deewaar' something inside them got underlined. Because deep inside they feel they are doing it for good. At heart everybody is a Robin Hood there. The irony of it all was to be captured with a very spicy humour that the space inherently has. The innocence still lingers somewhere in the eyes of the misguided vengeful souls who know no other way to live but kill.”
He is also accused of making profanities part of cinematic language. “My point is profanity should not be there for the sake of it. I come from a region where it is part of everyday language and the way they use it is how we are using it in the film.” It is a five-and-a-half-hour long saga is divided into two parts. “The script is of 240 pages and I wanted to use all of it. Ram Gopal Varma's experiment didn't work but I believe if your story holds and each part looks complete in itself, people will come to watch even 10 parts.” (...) 
He hasn't given up on the independent filmmaker in him. (...) Also, he elaborates that even in his so-called big films he negotiates a lot. “Shooting style remains the same. We work well within the budgets, cast local actors, use guerrilla techniques. (...) But that doesn't mean compromise. Technique-wise we are strong. For the last three years our films (‘Dev. D', ‘Udaan', ‘Shaitan'), are winning the best awards in cinematography and sound.” (...)
On comparisons with Dibakar Banerjee: “To me he is Hindi cinema biggest filmmaker. I don't take the kind of responsibilities that Dibakar takes. I get very personal, at times indulgent. (...) I am a big cinephile. I remain limited to cinema. He is boundless. I am a researched filmmaker, he is an organic filmmaker. His observation of little-little things is marvellous. I don't know what to do and how to do. I know what not to do. I negate things to make my way. Dibakar knows where he has to go. His music sense is very strong. I don't know music. I have to scrape a lot. He is natural. Yes my destiny is perhaps better than Dibakar. He should be given the space that he deserves at the international level”.'

Sonam Kapoor - Cannes, 2012 (abito Dolce&Gabbana)


- How Peddlers reflects the indie spirit, Nyay Bhushan, The Hollywood Reporter, 20 maggio 2012:
'THR: How did the concept of Peddlers come about?
Bala: It really came from this person I knew - the growing up and witnessing of him. It started off with him and became a coming of age story through this personality. The things that define who you are at a particular stage in your life. It’s about innocence being thrust between many guarded souls. The whole idea of innocence lost is taken a little ahead as innocence destroyed. The loss of innocence is treated as destruction so I had to put in extreme characters. There is nothing better in evolution than a man-woman relationship. The boy-to-man-to-devil curve happens through a relationship. That worked like a big catalyst.
THR: You have also said that you wanted to show a massively populated city like Mumbai as a ghost town.
Bala: The idea was to treat Mumbai as a ghost town, because when you think of Mumbai, you think huge crowds so I eliminated that. The characters don’t venture out with crowds so you see them only when Mumbai is empty. It’s this whole idea of people being locked in. So the film turned the concept of Mumbai on its head. The paths of the three main characters collide with the whole idea being that the city doesn’t matter. (...)
THR: What is your take on the indie scene in India?
Bala: What works for indie cinema is that those who are getting into it are not bound by any rules. The problem is with those who understand the rules and hence get stuck by the rules. There is a naivete amongst us which lets us do things just for the heck of it. We are not saying that we have to go to Cannes. It’s really about making any kind of film - maybe it’s a bit of foolhardiness and arrogance. Those energies lead us somewhere rather than following any conscious decision to improve things or make a statement. But yes, when you are saying something strong or individualistic, there would be a statement, there would be a signature.
THR: Do you see new opportunities for your kind of cinematic sensibilities since the Indian mainstream is trying to change despite the odds?
Bala: The whole act of rebellion, even if it is not there per se, I mean the whole idea that it even sounds like a rebellion turns me on. There is a subtle aggression. But I must say that if Peddlers was made with more comfort levels, it wouldn’t have half the impact it has now. Just the fact that every morning you didn’t know if your location would be available. You are shooting and ten feet away my production guy is fighting with the location owner who wants us to vacate right away. There is a certain kind of energy that propels the indie movement.
THR: Another interesting thing with indie films is how they are boosting new talent.
Bala: I think if you make it clear that choosing the actor has to be a very free-flowing decision by the director and not thrust by a producer to look for a marketable face, then it becomes easier. That helped as I could choose anyone, right from the streets to the theatre. I also met some people who came via Facebook. More than auditions, I believed in interacting with the talent. This is not a film bound by a script or character-driven. I wanted the actors to bring something of their own to the project. And I wanted to see if they were aligned with the story. Most of the people had traces of their own characters. I didn’t want them to undergo an acting process. So it was more organic. They really came from incredible backgrounds. I mean one guy is a photographer whose father was a porn film-maker. I saw a documentary on him and I called him to ask if he wants to act. He came and he was the most natural thing in the film. There are these surprise elements that raise the bar'.

Anurag Kashyap - Cannes, 2012


- A minute with: Anurag Kashyap, Shilpa Jamkhandikar, Reuters, 20 maggio 2012
- In concomitanza con il Festival di Cannes, il 21 maggio 2012 Variety ha pubblicato tre articoli dedicati al cinema indiano: Bombay bazaar, Regional films feed India's need for more films, Bollywood: moving past its signature style.
- Anurag Kashyap on Gangs of Wasseypur, The Hollywood Reporter, 21 maggio 2012:
'THR: How do you see your entries at Cannes validating what you’ve been striving to do in India?
Kashyap: If you get validation from outside, then suddenly everything you do at home is justified. We are brought up in a way where we do what our fathers do. You are not expected to rock the boat, you don’t change the status quo, especially in films, which have been traditionally controlled by a handful of people, actually film families. Outsiders are not supposed to change anything. I can’t complain about that, but now there is change happening. The young filmmakers really don’t give a damn about the establishment. They want to do their own thing, they are not star-struck, especially if you see the other Indian films at Cannes. (...) I still have one foot in Bollywood, (...) but these guys are totally independent of that. They worked hard for years to get their films made independently. My film is still funded by a studio. (...) My responsibility is now only to my kind of cinema, but these new directors will do more to change Indian cinema since their films are very fearless.
THR: So you don’t think Gangs of Wasseypur is fearless?
Kashyap: It is fearless only in its cost and casting. (...) In terms of storytelling, it is entertaining and mainstream, but not that fearless. It is not a Bollywood film, but about a place that is impacted by Bollywood, so it makes it commercial. The West sometimes doesn’t understand Bollywood, but they can definitely understand how Bollywood influences people'.

Nawazuddin Siddiqui - Cannes, 2012


- Indian films shine at Cannes film festival, Priyanka Dasgupta, The Times of India, 23 maggio 2012:
'While Indian celebs bond at the French Riviera this year, thanks to the gang of directors like Anurag Kashyap, Onir and Nila Madhab Panda, people are now talking more about Indian celebs who’ve been to Cannes by virtue of their work and not for being the face of a cosmetic major. (...) When recent Indian cinema is giving reasons to celebrate, isn’t it worthwhile to focus on that as well and not just on the glamour quotient? Monday night was time for celebrations for the Indian brigade. Anurag Kashyap, Onir, Sanjay Suri, (...) Sudhir Mishra, (...) Gulshan Devaiah and Nila Madhab Panda danced to Bollywood numbers. For them, it was a time to celebrate the global recognition of independent Indian cinema.
Nawazuddin Siddiqui, who has three movies at Cannes, flew to France on Monday night. The actor attributes this lack of awareness to both ignorance and the existence of a lobby that emphasises misplaced priorities. (...) “Designers didn’t want to give me something that I could wear at the Cannes red carpet. So, I went to a local tailor to get a suit stitched for myself. There is a lobby at work that doesn’t want underdogs to get their recognition. It suits them to not pay attention to them to avoid a threat. But, things are changing slowly. Ten years ago, I wouldn’t have had the guts to talk about this issue. I, at least, have a voice now,” he says. 
Says Onir, (...) “Though things are changing, acting prowess is not what gets media coverage in India. It’s the commerce that matters. (...) They do know about the stars and what they are wearing even if it’s for endorsing a brand. Yet, I’m very optimistic after my Cannes visit this year because I see a change in mindset.” (...)
Panda, on his part, says, “International buyers are interested in our movies. Bollywood glam will always be there. Some will talk about backless gowns but there are others who are discussing our movies. That’s good for us. Work apart, we are having a great time partying at Cannes”.' L'articolo si conclude con la lista dei titoli indiani premiati a Cannes dal 1946 al 1999.

Arjun Rampal e Mehr Jesia - Cannes, 2012


- Recensione di Miss Lovely, Marco Minniti, Movieplayer, 24 maggio 2012
- Recensione di Gangs of Wasseypur, Marco Grosoli, Sentieri Selvaggi, 24 maggio 2012
- Recensione di Gangs of Wasseypur, Internazionale, 24 maggio 2012
- The haunting Hunter song, Prabalika M. Borah, The Hindu, 24 maggio 2012:
'The Hunter song from ‘Gangs of Wasseypur' is making waves.
I am a hunter
She want to see my gun
When I pull it out
Woman started run
(...) Which hunter? He comes from Wasseypur and you can listen to him in Gangs of Wasseypur, the latest from Anuraag Kashyap's kitty. (...) While most of the team is in Cannes, TV and radio listeners are not getting enough of this song which is being aired in most music channels. (...) What catches the attention is the style, words and the distinct use of folk and rural instruments. Sang by Vedesh Sookoo, Rajneesh, Shyamoo and Munna the lyrics of the title have been penned by Varun Grover. Recorded in the Chutney music theme the song has almost become viral.
Music director Anup Rubens says, “It is a very novel way of introducing music which is less known to people. Besides giving the industry a new theme, it also gives due recognition to the style which might have its origin in either folk or rural.” Rubens also adds that it is only movies which can make new music genres popular. “Albums usually fail to create the charm that music in movies succeeds in doing.”
While everyone is enjoying the song and discussing it on social media, it's also talk about the theme in which it is recorded. Hunter is recorded in the Chutney Music theme which has its roots in the Indo-Caribbean. Chutney music is contemporary fusion of genres created by Indo-Caribbean people whose ancestors belonged to places like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Bengal and South India. Established in the 1940s within temples, wedding houses, and cane fields, Chutney music became popular in 1968. The Chutney Music is up-tempo song, accompanied by electric guitar, synthesizer, dholak harmonium and dhantal. In the 1980s, Chutney music saw more evolution. The modern chutney artist writes lyrics in either Hindi, Bhojpuri or English and then lays it on top of beats that come from Indian beats from the dholak mixed with the Soca beat'.

Sonam Kapoor - Cannes, 2012


- Recensione di Miss Lovely, Alfonso Mastrantonio, Indie-eye, 25 maggio 2012
- Indian cinema is a joke at Cannes, Subhash K. Jha, The Times of India, 25 maggio 2012: non tutti sono entusiasti per il numero di pellicole indiane proiettate quest'anno al Festival di Cannes e negli eventi collaterali alla manifestazione. Il produttore Sheetal Vinod Talwar commenta così la festa organizzata all'Indian Pavilion: 'It's nothing but mutual masturbation. We're a fucking joke at Cannes. Every year we hear of this or that film going to Cannes. The fact is, hardly any Indian ever makes it into the competitive section. Even this year apart from Ashim Ahluwalia's Miss Lovely, all the other films that you hear about being at Cannes are in non-competitive sections. Every year I come here and I see the Indian government's money being wasted by the so-called Indian Pavilion. What does this Pavilion achieve every year at Cannes? According to me, zilch. Every year members of the Indian film industry travel business class to Cannes, party with one another and go back without making any difference to global cinema. What does the party achieve in terms of getting us global recognition? How can we claim to crack Cannes when we can't even get any international filmmaker or actor to attend our party out there? (...) The rest of us - and I include myself - are only wasting our time over here at Cannes. Indian cinema is a joke at Cannes. But we don't realize it because we're busy having a good time at our government's expense. We continue to praise our own cinema and feel great about making what we consider world-class cinema. But face it barring a stray Satyajit Ray or Mira Nair, the world is not interested in our cinema'.
- 'Bollywood doesn't grow because it's self-sufficient', Srijana Mitra Das, The Times of India, 25 maggio 2012 - Intervista concessa da Anurag Kashyap:
'Where does Bollywood stand today in a global film context like Cannes?
Well, 'Bollywood' is a manifold thing. Outside, they mostly know mainstream Bollywood whereas the two streams of regional cinema making a lot more progress are Tamil and Marathi - the best films we're making today are in Tamil and Marathi. If you talk about mainstream masala, Telugu cinema's doing this better than us. We're borrowing from their masala and remaking this. We're not creating our own original mainstream Bollywood today - this often becomes derivative. And the West mainly sees this. It's just entertainment for them... they watch Bollywood like B-movies are seen.
But Bollywood also doesn't grow because fortunately or unfortunately, it's self-sufficient. A Bollywood film doesn't need to sell even one ticket to a foreigner to sustain itself. People from European cinema or diverse film streams need to sell tickets to other regions to sustain themselves. That's why European films don't have an industry. Most of their films are funded by institutions or government bodies. But our films are business, funded by private people and studios. It makes money for everyone. Because of this, we're cocooned in it, we're very happy inside - and we don't grow. So, with Bollywood today, the good part is we don't need to sell outside, we don't need the West. The other simultaneous thing is we don't grow as cinema.
How would you then explain the experimental commercial films we're seeing from new directors?
The few progressive filmmakers are all from outside Bollywood's circle. Zoya Akhtar is probably the only insider strongly rooted in her context, yet experimental. But film in India has largely been controlled by families who've made only love stories. That's their whole idea of cinema. New cinema is being made by filmmakers who come from across India, from small towns and different regions, not from film families. They're the ones doing this other kind of cinema because there is such an India that exists and such stories that need to be told - these people are the ones telling them.'
- Recensione di Miss Lovely, Marco Grosoli, Sentieri Selvaggi, 27 maggio 2012
- Video Bollywood Hungama: Kashyap incontra la stampa all'Indian Pavilion a Cannes

15 aprile 2012

IL CENTENARIO DEL CINEMA INDIANO

Raja Harishchandra - 1913


In India, lo sappiamo, il Tempo non conta. La precisione storica o le date non sono così importanti. Difficile quindi stabilire la nascita del cinema indiano, l'industria leader nel mondo per numero di film prodotti annualmente e per numero di spettatori. The Times of India pubblica oggi due interessanti articoli dedicati al centenario del cinema del subcontinente, proponendo però due date diverse relative alla prima proiezione pubblica della prima pellicola totalmente indiana, Raja Harishchandra di Dadasaheb Phalke, proiezione avvenuta nel 1913. Comunque sia, sabato prossimo 21 aprile o, se preferite, il 3 maggio, il cinema indiano entrerà trionfale nel suo centesimo anno di vita.

Avijit Ghosh, che propende per il 21 aprile e per l'Olympia Theatre di Bombay, in Celluloid century scrive:
'Sin dall'inizio, il cinema in India costituì molto di più che una fantasiosa via di fuga dalla dura realtà. I film presentavano spesso anche un contenuto sociale e un sottotesto politico. A dispetto della gerarchia definita dalla divisione in platea e galleria, il cinema massificò e democratizzò l'intrattenimento come mai era avvenuto prima. Nell'oscurità della sala, le differenze di casta ed etnia erano momentaneamente sospese. Nell'India coloniale talvolta il grande schermo divenne un canale surrogato per veicolare sentimenti nazionalisti. La prima controversia affrontata dalla censura non riguardò una scena di nudo o di violenza, bensì la pellicola Bhakta Vidur (1921), considerata un'allegoria politica sovversiva. Le canzoni regalarono al cinema indiano la sua caratteristica distintiva, ma persino un brano musicale poteva diventare allusivamente sedizioso. Nel blockbuster con Ashok Kumar, Kismet (1943), la canzone Aaj Himalay Ki Choti Se - Door Hato Ae Duniyawalon Hindustan Hamara Hai (testo di Kavi Pradeep) sfidò quasi apertamente il potere britannico.
In ogni lingua e dialetto il cinema diventò espressione di orgoglio e di identità. Negli anni cinquanta e sessanta, malgrado l'infuocato dibattito riguardante la lingua, i brani delle pellicole hindi venivano trasmessi dalle radio di tutto il Paese. Pur con i suoi limiti, il cinema assunse una funzione unificante al pari del cricket.
Oggi l'India è il più grande produttore al mondo di film. Negli anni cinquanta il cinema indiano guardava all'Unione Sovietica e al Medio Oriente. Ora è pronto a monetizzare il suo valore e a trasformarsi in fenomeno davvero globale. 3 idiots ha incassato all'estero più di dieci milioni di dollari. My name is Khan più di due milioni e mezzo nella Corea del sud. I tempi cambiano e cambiano anche le pellicole popolari, sia da un punto di vista estetico che da quello contenutistico. I film sono più brevi, offrono uno spazio maggiore agli attori comprimari, e le canzoni vengono considerate più un'imposizione che parte della narrazione'.

Archana Khare Ghose, che propende per il 3 maggio e per il Coronation Cinema di Bombay, in Marking movie's high moment scrive:
'Quando il 3 maggio 1913 Dadasaheb Phalke presentò Raja Harishchandra al Coronation Cinema di Mumbai, non immaginò che stava per spianare la strada ad un'industria che negli anni a venire sarebbe diventata il più grande denominatore comune dell'identità del Paese. Né poteva immaginare che il cinema avrebbe valicato ogni possibile barriera eretta nell'India pluralista per divenire ciò che l'attore Farooq Sheikh ha definito il più vasto amalgama culturale indiano.
Da quest'anno i National Film Award verranno sempre consegnati il 3 maggio. Alla prossima cerimonia di assegnazione dei premi, il ministro dell'informazione annuncerà i progetti previsti per il centenario, fra cui la costituzione del National Heritage Mission - un'istituzione che digitalizzerà, restaurerà e conserverà tutte le pellicole indiane disponibili -, e l'inaugurazione del Museum of Indian Cinema, localizzato in due edifici a Mumbai, di cui uno pronto per dicembre. In programma anche la costituzione di un ufficio centrale per la gestione delle location cinematografiche indiane, l'organizzazione di un evento da includere nella prossima parata della festa della repubblica, l'emissione di un francobollo, l'apertura di un sito internet da parte del National Film Archive of India che consentirà agli utenti di partecipare alle celebrazioni. Il centenario verrà festeggiato nei festival internazionali: l'India è già stata dichiarata Paese ospite al Festival di Cannes 2013'.

Aggiornamento del 29 maggio 2012 - Attitude Bollytude, Mukul Kesavan, Outlook:
'Unlike other fictional forms, the feature film didn’t come to us second-hand: we were in on the story from the beginning. Colonised countries like ours borrowed the short story, the novel and literary modernism itself from the West. (...) But the feature film as a fictional form is unique because it emerged at exactly the same time in India as it did in Britain or America. (...) The overwhelming majority of feature films made in India during the silent era had mythological and historical themes; western cinema framed its films in formally realist settings. (...) Cinema in India didn’t dance to the western tunes; it marched to the beat of its own drum. (...) this emphasis on ‘hybridity’ and borrowing leads critics into a larger temptation, namely, the idea that Indian film-makers adapted an art made elsewhere to exotic Indian ends. (...) This unease is compounded by the feeling that not only are Bombay’s films not original, they are also, in terms of the production values of the western film, not very good. (...) The truth is that it is not Bombay’s cinema but our understanding of what a good film ought to be that is derivative'.
 
Vedi anche Raja Harishchandra, 4 aprile 2013. La sezione Centenary of Indian Cinema è interamente dedicata alle celebrazioni dei primi 100 favolosi anni del Cinema Indiano.

08 aprile 2012

OPEN INDIA - FESTIVAL OF MODERN INDIAN CINEMA AND CULTURE IN RUSSIA 2012


La prima edizione dell'Open India - Festival of Modern Indian Cinema and Culture in Russia si svolgerà dal 13 al 15 aprile 2012 a Mosca, dal 17 al 22 aprile 2012 a San Pietroburgo, e nel settembre 2012 in altre località russe. Non solo film, ma anche musica, cucina, filosofia, arte, moda, mostre fotografiche. Vi segnalo alcune delle pellicole in cartellone: 3 idiots, Taare Zameen Par, Ishqiya, Delhi-6, Jab We Met, Jodhaa Akbar, A wednesday!, Wake up Sid, Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna, Corporate, I hate luv storys. Al festival sono attesi Rajkumar Hirani, R. Madhavan e Sharman Joshi. Fra gli eventi in programma, segnalo la mostra fotografica The history of Bollywood, e la presentazione dell'edizione in lingua russa del volume King of Bollywood - Shah Rukh Khan and the seductive world of Indian cinema di Anupama Chopra.


Aggiornamenti del 6 maggio 2012: non solo la Germania, anche la Russia, malgrado l'irrisorio tasso di immigrazione indiana, è follemente innamorata del cinema popolare in lingua hindi. Nella ex Unione Sovietica l'amore sbocciò negli anni cinquanta del secolo scorso, quando Awaara fu distribuito nelle sale del Paese. Raj Kapoor venne accolto dal pubblico locale con grande entusiasmo: la sua automobile (con l'attore/regista blindato all'interno) venne letteralmente sospinta da una folla di ammiratori dalla sala cinematografica all'hotel. Lo scorso 13 aprile, quando il ministro degli esteri indiano, inaugurando il festival a Mosca, ha menzionato Raj Kapoor, nella sala gremita si è scatenato un fragoroso applauso. Sharman Joshi, alla proiezione di 3 idiots, è stato osannato dagli spettatori. Eppure è dal 1992 che i film hindi non vengono distribuiti in Russia. 
- Give comrades Bollywood, Shobhan Saxena, The Times of India
- After Awaara, I fell for Nargis, Shobhan Saxena, The Times of India: intervista concessa da un traduttore russo di pellicole hindi.

Aggiornamento del 3 dicembre 2021 - La classifica I dieci film stranieri che sbancarono il botteghino in URSS pubblicata da Russia Beyond è piena di sorprese:
'9 / Barood (India, 1976) - In Urss, Bollywood era incredibilmente popolare e molti film ebbero grandi incassi al botteghino. Il cinema dell’India, Paese amico, era ideologicamente neutrale e veniva mostrato molto spesso nella terra dei soviet. Il film d’azione “Barood”, diretto da Pramod Chakravorty, era stato un flop al botteghino indiano, ma in Urss divenne un vero successo, con il titolo (...) “Il vendicatore”. Uscì nel 1978 e venne visto da 60 milioni di persone. L’attore Rishi Kapoor, che interpretava il ruolo di protagonista, era già familiare al grande pubblico sovietico grazie al melodramma “Bobby” (1973), e nel 1991 venne invitato a recitare nella coproduzione sovietico-indiana “Ajooba”.
8 / Disco Dancer (India, 1982) - Questo melodramma musicale indiano su un cantante di strada è apparso sugli schermi sovietici nel 1984 e ha avuto un enorme successo di pubblico. È stato visto da 60,9 milioni di persone, e molti, in seguito, hanno visto il film più di una volta. Il segreto del successo del film di Babbar Subhash (titolato in Russia ... “Tantsor disko”) sono i balli, le canzoni, i paesaggi e gli abiti esotici e, naturalmente, una trama con cui si entra in empatia. Bisogna però dire che alcune scene di ballo nella versione sovietica vennero accorciate. I sovietici conoscevano quasi a memoria la canzone “Jimmy Jimmy Jimmy Aaja”, e l’attore Mithun Chakraborty, che interpretava il ballerino della discoteca, divenne un eroe popolare (e in seguito è stato in visita in Urss e in Russia più di una volta).
6 / Bobby (India, 1973) - Abbiamo già detto che l’attore Rishi Kapoor aveva fatto innamorare il pubblico sovietico con questo film, che è un melodramma su dei Romeo e Giulietta indiani. I genitori appartengono a caste diverse: lei è figlia di persone benestanti e lui è figlio di un pescatore, e inoltre sono di diverse religioni. Le esperienze amorose e la disuguaglianza di classe nell’Urss erano temi molto apprezzati. Il film uscì sugli schermi sovietici nel 1975 e fu visto da 62,6 milioni di persone.
3 / Awaara (India, 1951) - Il film racconta la toccante storia di Raj, nato in uno slum e costretto a diventare un ladro. In cuor suo non è affatto così e la sua coscienza lo tormenta (e poi ha un padre ricco!). Alla fine, Raj viene mandato ai lavori forzati e la sua amata promette di aspettarlo, proprio come Sonechka Marmeladova in “Delitto e castigo”, o come la moglie di un decabrista. In generale, la trama piacque al popolo sovietico. Il film, in russo intitolato (...) “Il vagabondo”, è uno dei primi melodrammi indiani che conquistò il pubblico sovietico, dopo la sua uscita nelle sale nel 1954. Fu visto da 63,7 milioni di persone e in seguito il regista nonché attore protagonista, Raj Kapoor, fu soprannominato in Unione Sovietica “tovarishch Brodjaga” (“compagno vagabondo”). A proposito, è lui che in seguito girerà il film “Bobby”, dove recita anche suo figlio, Rishi Kapoor'.

01 aprile 2012

GOLDEN KELA AWARD PER L'ANNO 2011: I VINCITORI



Questa sera sono stati assegnati i Golden Kela Award per la peggior produzione bollywoodiana del 2011. Vi segnalo di seguito i vincitori nelle categorie meno ambite:

* Peggior film: Ra.One
* Peggior regista: Anubhav Sinha per Ra.One
* Peggior attore protagonista: Imran Khan per Mere Brother Ki Dulhan
* Peggior attrice protagonista: Deepika Padukone per Aarakshan

Fra i premi più fantasiosi:
* 'Ma ti ha dato di volta il cervello?': Pankaj Kapur per Mausam
* 'Per favore: piantala che ne abbiamo abbastanza': Pritam
* Premio della vergogna per la peggior realizzazione cinematografica di un tema serio: Aarakshan

Al mitico regista di B-movie Kanti Shah è stato conferito il Platinum Kela Award for his excellence in cinema. Shah ha commentato: 'Sono felice di essere stato invitato ad un evento organizzato da veri appassionati del mio lavoro. Questa cerimonia è proprio speciale'.

(Grazie ad Atif)

24 marzo 2012

L'OMOSESSUALITÀ NEL CINEMA HINDI



(Testo aggiornato il 20 marzo 2022)

Scorrendo la lista dei titoli in lingua hindi premiati nel 2012 col prestigioso National Film Award, stupisce la presenza di I am, pellicola indipendente finanziata grazie ad una raccolta fondi internazionale organizzata in rete, diretta da un regista omosessuale (Onir), e che tratta argomenti impopolari: l'omosessualità, l'abuso sessuale su minori, le donazioni di sperma. 
Vi riporto di seguito le dichiarazioni rilasciate da Onir a Business of Cinema il 10 marzo 2012:
'Non è un trionfo solo personale. A livello più ampio, è una vittoria per i registi omosessuali e per quei film sempre trascurati dai National Award e dai premi popolari. Ora dovremmo poter lavorare in un'atmosfera di maggior tolleranza e libertà, dal momento che è stato chiaramente affermato che le pellicole sull'omosessualità non sono peccaminose. (A proposito della censura imposta ad I am per la diffusione via satellite) Ho combattuto con tutte le mie forze per salvare la sequenza del bacio fra i due protagonisti omosessuali, ma è stata tagliata. Pare sia consentito il bacio fra uomo e donna, ma non fra due uomini. Non vedo nulla di male nel fatto che il regista Rituparno Ghosh si concentri su film a tematica omosessuale. Se la maggioranza dei cineasti può raccontare esclusivamente relazioni eterosessuali, perché alcuni di noi non possono creare consapevolezza sull'argomento dell'omosessualità attraverso il nostro cinema? Non sto affermando che tutte le mie pellicole si baseranno su tematiche omosessuali, ma se ritengo l'argomento adatto al mio schema creativo, perché no? Il National Award conferito ad I am, film che tratta anche di omosessualità, arriva in una fase in cui abbiamo disperatamente bisogno di superare i pregiudizi contro la comunità omosessuale'.


Non sono molte le pellicole hindi che trattano di omosessualità. Ve ne segnalo alcune:
* Bomgay (1996), cortometraggio di produzione indipendente diretto da Riyad Vinci Wadia e Jangu Sethna, con Rahul Bose. Bomgay si ispira alle composizioni poetiche a tema omosessuale di R. Raj Rao. Bomgay non è stato sottoposto al vaglio del Central Board of Film Certification, l'ente governativo preposto alla censura, e di conseguenza non è mai stato proiettato nelle sale. Il regista, affetto da AIDS, è deceduto nel 2003 a soli 36 anni;
* Fire (1998, hindi e inglese), produzione indo-canadese diretta da Deepa Mehta, con Shabana Azmi e Nandita Das. Fire si ispira al racconto urdu Lihaaf (1942) della scrittrice Ismat Chughtai. La sua distribuzione provocò una reazione violenta, in diverse città del Paese, da parte di esponenti dello Shiv Sena e del BJP, e segnò l'inizio di un dibattito a livello nazionale sul tema dei diritti degli omosessuali;
* Girlfriend (2004) di Karan Razdan;
* My brother Nikhil (2005) di Onir, con Juhi Chawla. La pellicola si ispira alla vita dell'attivista Dominic D'Souza; 
* Dostana (2008) di Tarun Mansukhani, con Priyanka Chopra, Abhishek Bachchan e John Abraham. Commedia di grandissimo successo, famosa per il bacio scambiato da Abhishek e John, trasmessa anche dalla Rai doppiata in italiano col titolo Appartamento per tre;
* Straight (2009) commedia di Parvati Balagopalan, con Vinay Pathak e Gul Panag;
* Dunno Y Na Jaane Kyon (2010, hindi e inglese) di Sanjay Sharma. Vincitore di diversi premi internazionali, fra cui il premio speciale i Ken ONLUS assegnato a Napoli, nell'ambito dell'Omovies International Film Festival 2014, agli attori Yuvraaj Parashar e Kapil Kaustubh Sharma 'per l’impegno civile ed il sacrificio personale a difesa del coming out dell’amore omosessuale nell’India di oggi'. I genitori di Parashar avevano intentato una causa legale di disconoscimento nei confronti del figlio, a causa della distribuzione della pellicola. A Parashar è stato assegnato lo stesso premio speciale anche nel 2016, per la promozione dell'omosessualità nel cinema hindi, e nel 2018 l'attore è tornato a Napoli (clicca qui per le interviste video ufficiali). Nel 2015 è stato realizzato il sequel, dal titolo Dunno Y² - Life is a moment, coproduzione indo-norvegese diretta da Tonje Gjevjon e Sanjay Sharma.
* Bombay Talkies (2013) per l'episodio diretto da Karan Johar, con Rani Mukherjee e Randeep Hooda. Il film è stato proiettato al Festival di Cannes 2013;
* Margarita with a straw (2015) di Shonali Bose, con Kalki Koechlin. La pellicola è stata proiettata in concorso al Giffoni Film Festival 2015;
* Aligarh (2016) di Hansal Mehta, con Rajkummar Rao e uno strepitoso Manoj Bajpayee. La pellicola si ispira alla vita di Ramchandra Siras, docente presso la Aligarh Muslim University, sospeso nel 2010 perché colto durante un incontro omosessuale, e deceduto - probabilmente suicida - qualche mese dopo;
* Ek Ladki Ko Dekha Toh Aisa Laga (2019) di Shelly Chopra Dhar, con Sonam Kapoor, Rajkummar Rao, Anil Kapoor e Juhi Chawla. A differenza di Dostana, ELKDTAL non ripropone i soliti stereotipi, ma, malgrado il cast di celebrità, non ha conseguito lo stesso successo. L'attivista Gazal Dhaliwal ha collaborato alla sceneggiatura e ai dialoghi;
* Shubh Mangal Zyada Saavdhan (2020) commedia di Hitesh Kewalya, con Ayushmann Khurrana;
* Ajeeb Daastaans (2021) per l'episodio diretto da Neeraj Ghaywan, con Konkona Sen Sharma e Aditi Rao Hydari;
* Lihaaf (2021) di Rahat Kazmi, trasposizione cinematografica del racconto urdu Lihaaf (1942) della scrittrice Ismat Chughtai;
* Badhaai Do (2022) commedia di Harshavardhan Kulkarni, con Rajkummar Rao e Bhumi Pednekar.


Cenni all'omosessualità si riscontrano anche in Honeymoon Travels Pvt. Ltd., Fashion, Hum Tum Aur Ghost, Angry Indian Goddesses, Kapoor & Sons.
Fra i titoli non hindi, segnalo Mango Soufflé (2002, inglese) di Mahesh Dattani; Memories in March (2011, inglese e bengali) di Sanjoy Nag, interpretato dal regista Rituparno Ghosh, vincitore nel 2011 del National Award per il miglior film in lingua inglese; Finally Bhalobasha (2019, bengali) di Anjan Dutt; Dangerous (2021, telugu) di Ram Gopal Varma. Cenni in 90 ML (tamil).
Fra i romanzi, cito Babyji di Abha Dawesar, Funny boy dello scrittore cingalese Shyam Selvadurai (nel 2020 è stata distribuita la pellicola omonima, di produzione internazionale, diretta da Deepa Mehta) e Lo scrivano di Bombay di Anjali Joseph.


Hrithik Roshan, attore molto apprezzato dalla comunità omosessuale indiana, a seguito di una polemica scatenatasi a fine febbraio 2012 - causata da alcune stupefacenti dichiarazioni rilasciate da esponenti politici sul tema dell'omosessualità -, ai primi di marzo aveva diramato un chiaro comunicato nel quale fra l'altro si legge: 'Discrimination against homosexuals is exactly that - discrimination. And ANY form of discrimination is WRONG. It’s taken us hundreds of years to evolve as a society and realise how ridiculous and preposterous discrimination against race/caste is. How many more years is it going to take us to be mature enough and learn to accept individual sexual inclination? Perhaps the starting point is to understand that homosexuality is NOT a matter of choice. (...) Being gay is NOT a disease we need to fear! (...) Any society that does not offer freedom to human beings to live as they are, to pursue their dreams, to express themselves as part of the human race is basically a society still in the clutches of the dark ages'.

L'articolo 100 years of Indian Cinema: Homosexuality in films, di Rituparna Chatterjee, pubblicato da CNN News18 il 27 febbraio 2013, segnala pellicole in diverse lingue indiane che trattano l'argomento omosessualità e transgender, e ne traccia una breve storia.
Vedi anche Onir: Don't censor my views, 24 luglio 2013


Yuvraaj Parashar - Napoli, 2018

15 marzo 2012

TONGUES ON FIRE LONDON ASIAN FILM FESTIVAL 2012



La 14esima edizione del Tongues on Fire London Asian Film Festival si svolgerà dal 16 al 24 marzo 2012. Fra i titoli in cartellone, segnalo Adaminte Makan Abu, Guzaarish e Bol. Abhishek Bachchan inaugurerà la manifestazione, e incontrerà il pubblico il 17 marzo al May Fair Hotel. Sanjay Leela Bhansali, a cui verrà conferito un premio, sarà a Londra dal 21 al 24 marzo. Il 22 marzo terrà una conferenza alla University of Westminster.
Aggiornamento del 25 marzo 2012: Bol si è aggiudicato il premio per il miglior film. Ma ecco la vera sorpresa: Italo Spinelli ha conquistato la statuetta per il miglior regista grazie a Gangor.

11 marzo 2012

FICCI FRAMES 2012




Il prestigioso convegno internazionale FICCI Frames 2012 si svolgerà dal 14 al 16 marzo presso il Renaissance Mumbai Convention Centre Hotel. Il tema di quest'anno è Embracing the digital world, il Paese ospite è il Giappone. Alla cerimonia di inaugurazione interverranno Karan Johar e Sonam Kapoor. Fra gli ospiti celebri, sono attesi Ekta Kapoor, Shekhar Kapur, Anurag Kashyap, Dibakar Banerjee, Imtiaz Ali, Farah Khan, Kunal Kohli, Zoya Akhtar, Anil Kapoor, Kabir Bedi, Vidya Balan, Ranbir Kapoor, Chetan Bhagat. Fra i numerosi eventi in cartellone, segnalo:

* 15 marzo: conferenza The art of movie, con Imtiaz Ali, Anurag Kashyap, Zoya Akhtar e Dibakar Banerjee;
* 16 marzo: conferenza Navigating the international waters: Indian cinema and actors overseas, con Anil Kapoor e Kabir Bedi;
* 16 marzo: conferenza Women in media & entertainment circa 2012: leading from the front?, con Vidya Balan, Farah Khan e Ekta Kapoor;
* 16 marzo: conferenza Censorship in India: challenges and the way forward, con Karan Johar, Kunal Kohli, Mahesh Bhatt e Kamal Haasan;
* 16 marzo: Imitiaz Ali in conversation with Ranbir Kapoor, incontro presentato da Karan Johar.

Aggiornamenti del 19 marzo 2012:
- Anurag, Zoya, Imtiaz and Amole discuss movie-making, Nikhil Ramsubramaniam, Bollywood Hungama, 16 marzo 2012. Di seguito un estratto:
'Anurag Kashyap said, "Instead of being filmmakers, we have become caterers, merely catering to the demands of the studio. In such a scenario, I had no choice but to become a producer if I wanted to make the films which I believed in. (...) I am the most ill-equipped producer and still don't understand numbers, accounting etc. but sadly if I didn't take this step, I wouldn't have been able to make films of my choice. A film like Udaan was languishing for almost 8 years and no one was interested in the film until I decided to produce it along with UTV. Some studios gave me all sorts of weird suggestions like casting Anil Kapoor and his son for the role of the father and son but I didn't pay heed to it and stuck by the director's vision."
Zoya Akhtar added, "Personally if you ask me I prefer my first film Luck By Chance. It was not easy making that film. I remember we couldn't get a single mainstream male actor for the budget we had and then zeroed in on Farhan. The film got various nominations and received a lot of critical acclaim but sadly it didn't quite work at the Box Office. However my second film Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara had big stars like Hrithik and Katrina which translated into huge Box Office numbers. This does prove that the star-system does work on a level. We are surviving because of our stars and their popularity. Besides Hollywood, China and us, no other film-industry is surviving today. We need creative producers. I want someone who is ready to support me and my vision whole-heartedly. There is a huge dearth of producers like this."
Imtiaz Ali (...) said, "The star system needs to change. Each time I was making a film, I was aware of certain imperfections in the plan. But slowly I realized it's up to me how I can try and better the situation. It took me 3 years to make my first film, Socha Na Tha, a film which should have been ideally made in 3 months. But post that, I have been lucky to work with people who share my vision. Of course, films do need to be profitable and make money for all concerned but that cannot be the sole aim. Having said that, I am happy when the financers of Rockstar told me we have easily broken even."
The panel also agreed that this is the best phase for Bollywood considering the diverse kind of films which are doing well. Amole Gupte (...) said, "Today, the audience is ready to accept different kinds of cinema provided it is good. Already this year we have seen films like Paan Singh Tomar and Kahaani (both cold-storage films) which have done exceedingly well. A lot of people were not sure if Stanley Ka Dabba would work but I went by my gut feel. I still remember theater owners calling to increase the shows in the second week owing to public demand. The film recently released in South Korea as well and by reports which have been coming in, the response has been fantastic".'
- Video Bollywood Hungama: partecipazione di Vidya Balan
- Video Bollywood Hungama: incontro Ranbir Kapoor/Imtiaz Ali moderato da Karan Johar

Sonam Kapoor - Cerimonia di inaugurazione

07 marzo 2012

NATIONAL FILM AWARD PER L'ANNO 2011: I VINCITORI

Vidya Balan


Oggi a Delhi sono stati proclamati i vincitori dei National Film Award per la produzione dell'anno 2011. Deool (marathi) di Umesh Vinayak Kulkarni e Byari (lingua beary) di Suveeran hanno conquistato il premio più ambito, quello per il miglior film. Girish Kulkarni, protagonista di Deool, si è aggiudicato la statuetta per il miglior attore protagonista. Gurvinder Singh ha vinto il premio per il miglior regista con Anhey Ghorhey Da Daan (che ha conquistato anche la statuetta per il miglior film in lingua punjabi e per la migliore fotografia). Ad Inshallah, Football (kashmiri, urdu, inglese), documentario di Ashvin Kumar alla cui produzione ha collaborato Giulia Achilli, è stato attribuito il premio best film on social issues.

La cinematografia in lingua hindi torna a Mumbai con un bottino niente male:
* The dirty picture: miglior attrice protagonista (Vidya Balan), migliori costumi (ex aequo), miglior trucco di scena (ex aequo);
* Chillar Party: miglior film per ragazzi, best child artist (un nugolo di attori) ex aequo con Stanley Ka Dabba, migliore sceneggiatura;
* I am: miglior film hindi;
* Stanley Ka Dabba: best child artist (Partho Gupte) ex aequo con Chillar Party;
* Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara: miglior coreografia (Bosco-Caesar per Señorita);
* Ra.One: migliori effetti speciali.

Onir

RASSEGNA STAMPA/VIDEO (aggiornata al 7 maggio 2012)

- This is a victory for independent filmmakers, Deepika Sahu, The Times of India, 10 marzo 2012. Dichiarazioni rilasciate da Onir: 'Ritengo che questo premio costituisca una vittoria per tutti i registi indipendenti. È molto difficile essere un cineasta indipendente. Non è solo una questione di costi di realizzazione e di distribuzione: il nostro cinema è governato dalla regola della gratificazione immediata. E i finanziatori non fanno che ripetere la formula che il pubblico non è interessato. Ma come può fiorire il nostro cinema se i giovani registi non vengono incoraggiati?'.
- Business of Cinema, 10 marzo 2012. Dichiarazioni rilasciate da Onir: 
'Non è un trionfo solo personale. A livello più ampio, è una vittoria per i registi omosessuali e per quei film sempre trascurati dai National Award e dai premi popolari. Ora dovremmo poter lavorare in un'atmosfera di maggior tolleranza e libertà, dal momento che è stato chiaramente affermato che le pellicole sull'omosessualità non sono peccaminose. (A proposito della censura imposta ad I am per la diffusione via satellite) Ho combattuto con tutte le mie forze per salvare la sequenza del bacio fra i due protagonisti omosessuali, ma è stata tagliata. Pare sia consentito il bacio fra uomo e donna, ma non fra due uomini. Non vedo nulla di male nel fatto che il regista Rituparno Ghosh si concentri su film a tematica omosessuale. Se la maggioranza dei cineasti può raccontare esclusivamente relazioni eterosessuali, perché alcuni di noi non possono creare consapevolezza sull'argomento dell'omosessualità attraverso il nostro cinema? Non sto affermando che tutte le mie pellicole si baseranno su tematiche omosessuali, ma se ritengo l'argomento adatto al mio schema creativo, perché no? Il National Award conferito ad I am, film che tratta anche di omosessualità, arriva in una fase in cui abbiamo disperatamente bisogno di superare i pregiudizi contro la comunità omosessuale'.
- Crowd funding: an emerging trend in Bollywood, Renu Singh, The Times of India, 11 marzo 2012: 
'How open is the Indian film industry in embracing this new trend?
Small is Big - Onir believes that this notion of funding will be of huge help to independent film makers and those who don’t get funding for innovative concept of movies which don’t follow regular Bollywood tastes. “The important part of crowd-funding is that film makers get finances from people who believe in their projects. It is a huge boost to those who find it difficult to generate finances through other means. We got funding for our out of the box subject. “I Am” is one of smallest budget films of 2011 in Bollywood which is one of largest film industries in the world. Getting a National Award for a film that has been funded this way is not a small deal,” shares Onir. (...)
Risk Reduction - When hundreds of movies in Bollywood releasing every year don’t find a good distribution and exhibition channel, crowd-funding is the safest option that reduces the risk of investment dividing the loss between many who are involved in the funding. Producer Guneet Monga frequently collaborates with Anurag Kashyap and is coming up with an untitled film directed by Vasan Bala. The finances for the movie are being raised through crowd-funding. Says Guneet, “Movies who don’t find studios for funding can very well go to masses and source finances from people who believe in their projects. We are coming up with a movie that is funded through social media. (...) This concept reduces the share of losses incurred. Thus it does not burden a single production house or an individual. Adds Onir, “Apart from reducing risks, crowd funding also lends transparency in financial dealings. One actually doesn’t have to get into talks with people and production houses who can interfere with the work.”
Money Matters - The people investing in movies not only get profit sharing in box-office collections but are also credited as co-producers in the movies. Says Onir, “All 400 investors in “I Am” got acknowledged as co-producers in the movie as well as being part of the profit sharing process.” (...)
The Bigger Picture - However, this funding process only works for small budget films. (...) Says Onir, “Crowd sourcing is more for independent film makers. It is not meant for big budget movies with a huge star cast. In any case, why would they even need it? They have production houses financing big names.” Guneet also says there is a limitation of fund pooled in for finance. “The biggest disadvantage of crowd-funding is you can’t raise a lot of money through it. That could be because it is an entirely new concept for the Indian market. We can hope that the situation improves in future.”
European connection - Another drawback of crowd-funding is that though the concept is doing good in the European market, Indian film makers find hard to attract investors from European countries. Guneet comes up with the solution for this problem. “One needs to structure the film well to access the European funds. One has to have a good script with an universal appeal that people from all over will like to be part of.”(...)
Copy Cat? - Another hitch is that the film’s concept might get copied when one asks for funding in the social media space'. 

Da destra: Onir, Shah Rukh Khan, Juhi Chawla e Sanjay Suri

- Video Business of Cinema. Il 26 aprile 2012 ha avuto luogo un evento celebrativo del National Award assegnato ad I am, evento al quale hanno partecipato, fra gli altri, Shah Rukh Khan, Juhi Chawla, Urmila Matondkar, Sanjay Suri e Gul Panag. 
- Can we ban the Censor Board, please?, Diksha Kamra, The Times of India, 4 maggio 2012. Dichiarazioni rilasciate da Ashvin Kumar: 
'What kind of problems did Ashvin face while shooting “Inshallah, Football”? “If a filmmaker puts his camera in Kashmir, he’s already facing a problem. You’re not made to feel particularly welcome by the armed forces. So obviously, I knew I might face some trouble,” Ashvin begins politely, and adds, “Plus, with the issues my films touch upon, they hold up a mirror to the nation. And we, as a nation, have a problem looking at ourselves in the mirror. We tend to smash the mirror even before we can see our reflection in it. (...) While shooting “Inshallah, Football”, I had every inkling that it might be banned, but as long as we don’t push the system, as long as we don’t raise the bar, we’re going to face mediocre treatment, and never let this country grow.” “Inshallah, Football” also has a cameo by J&K CM Omar Abdullah. How did that happen? “I was shooting the film in Kashmir, based on the real life of a young footballer who wants to fly to Brazil to play a football match but the Indian government does not give him a passport because his father is an ex-militant. While the shooting was going on, a journalist wrote about it in the paper there. Omar read about it, called up his department and arranged for a passport for the boy. This happened while we were shooting. So I approached him and luckily, he agreed. It was not me, but destiny that wrote him into the film’s script”.'
- It's a great year for Indian cinema, Patcy N., Rediff, 7 maggio 2012. Anurag Kashyap commenta così il National Award conferito a Vidya Balan: 'I think Vidya should be given an award just like that for her choice of films. Have other actresses got the confidence to come out of their comfort zone and act in different kinds of films? I am a big supporter of courage. Anybody who shows courage should be rewarded. The box office is rewarding her and the country is applauding her so I am happy for Vidya Balan. (...) I have thought about casting her many times and we have talked about ideas, but it has to be the right thing because people have certain expectations from her. I can't take a film to her unless the film is on her'.

Urmila Matondkar 

Gul Panag